FM DEEPWATER 91.1
Evidence 4
There is a lot on this page, so be patient and let it load
properly
The issue
A tower placed in the garden at the Deepwater railway
|
Note |
|
|
I am reminded
statements made to me (researcher) by FM board members. |
|
|
If you disagree my research I will give you the
opportunity to reply. |
Before
I show you my evidence 4 concerning FM 91.1 Deepwater make sure you overview the
previous evidence 1 and also look again at the page that discusses my findings
(Simply use arrows on the left top of your page to go back and forward).
Or
go
back to Frontpage and follow the trail back to here. At
the bottom of this page there is also a link to look at previous evidence
EVIDENCE 4
Because the Deepwater FM 91.1 Committee has deliberately refused to
communicate with groups in Deepwater and particularly those responsible for the
railway garden a tower has been erected in the middle of the Railway garden.
A mistake has been made.
|
|
If you were a gardener and you were proud of
your garden, how would you like someone to force on you a tower close to
the entrance and building (25 meters).
If the tower was (60 meters) North it would have been outside of the garden, where it should have been. All groups, State Rail, Council and those who look after the garden agreed the tower would be outside of the garden (60 meters). In my analysis at the bottom, I will show you that the FM
Deepwater Committee was not happy with the groups decision, State Rail,
Council and people who look after the garden. So the FM group
successfully managed to get State Rail and Council to place the tower
(25 meters) closer to the building. |
|
|
In the middle of the garden. It is beyond my comprehension that a group that never ever supported the group who look after the garden, can be so greedy in forcing this tower on those who developed the garden and maintain it. Look at next photo below |
|
|
This photo shows the absurdity of the
location of the tower.
and next photo below |
|
|
You have got to be joking for
this flawed decision!
Look where the tower is! Would you guys (guys is generic for male and female) place a tower in your own garden. You know very well you would not let that happen to you. But you deliberately placed a tower in someone else's garden. |
|
|
Each photo shows a mistake was made.
Next photo down, shows garden without the tower
Photo without the tower |
|
|
Photo showing the 91.1 before the
tower was erected and the next photo shows the tower in place.
|
|
|
The railway building and its garden in front. |
|
|
This photo shows the spot before the tower was erected. The garden was in place |
|
|
Notice how close the tower was being erected to the building. |
|
|
You can see where the tower was being
erected and the fence at the end.
The tower was to be the other side of the fence you can see. All groups would have been happy if that happened. But it did not. I will now analyze the situation as I see it.
|
Have
a look, and make your own decision whether the FM Deepwater Committee did the
wrong thing.
They (FM) are responsible for the tower being 25 meters from the building instead of
the 60 meters which would have put the tower out side of the garden.
In analyzing the situation, and the photos, it is clear that the tower was built in an
inappropriate spot because it overshadows the garden and activities.
The question has to be asked, `Why was the tower built in the spot it is?'
The first decision by the stake holders, was that the tower was to be built 60 meters away, outside of
the garden.
State Rail, Council and the group who overseers the building all agreed it would
be over the fence.
All information has been given to me by board members. So having
information from the horses mouth I can say clearly,
the Deepwater FM 91.1 Committee was unhappy with the spot, they wanted it
closer because it was going to be more expensive for them to connect to the
tower. We are dealing about a couple of thousand (approx).
A board member said to me (researcher) ` We had to place it closer because of
the cost...'
Another board member said, `State Rail and the council wanted it 60 meters away
from the building, but that does not suit us. and we told them so.'
So, without discussing it with Deepwater people (stakeholders who were
maintaining the gardens) the FM Committee made a deal with State Rail and the
Council, so the tower was built in the middle of the garden.
If the FM Committee had discussed their concerns to the stake holders
(community) I believe the the money would have been raised and the garden could
have been saved from that tower reaching to the heavens. The tower could have
been reaching the heavens on the other side of the fence and every body would have
been happy.
It is obvious the Railway garden has been desecrated.
A
prime garden at the railway building has been spoilt.
Of all places in the middle of the garden!
For heavens sake, how can you guys
be
so inconsiderate towards Deepwater citizens!
So selfish!
Have a happy read
Hendrik
|
I clearly add that if you believe I have made a mistake in my research, send me an Email and I will put your answer next to the offending item |
To go back to evidence buttons click here
To go back
to Frontpage